STAT217 Tutorial sheet #2 Solutions

 

Question 1

Ho: m £ 10

Ha: m > 10

Reject Ho if Z > 2.3263

Z = (11.25 – 10)/(3/sqrt(40)) = 2.6352

Reject Ho.

Conclude the average setup time is significantly greater than 10 minutes. They should not buy the equipment.

 

Question 2

P-value = P(Z > 2.6352) = 1 – P(Z < 2.6352) = 1 – 0.9958 = 0.0042. Since the p-value is less than 1%, this provides strong support for Ha and we reject Ho.

 

Question 3

Reject Ho if Z > 2.3263

Reject Ho if (xbar – 10)/(3/sqrt(40)) > 2.3263

Reject Ho if xbar > 10 + 2.3263(3)/sqrt(40)

Reject Ho if xbar > 11.1035

Power = P(reject Ho | Ha true)

Power = P(xbar > 11.1035 | m = 12)

Power = P(Z > (11.1035 – 12)/(3/sqrt(40)))

Power = P(Z > -1.89) = 1 – P(Z < -1.89) = 1 – 0.0294 = 0.9706.

Based on the power, it appears management made the correct decision to not buy the equipment.

 

Question 4

Ho: m ³ 22

Ha: m < 22

Reject Ho if t < -1.7613

t = (20.75 – 22)/(3.4/sqrt(15)) = -1.4239

Do not reject Ho.

Conclude the average battery life is not significantly less than 22 hours.

 

Question 5

P-value = P(t < -1.4239) = 0.0882 based on 14 degrees of freedom. Since we did not reject Ho in question 4, we would reject Ho for levels of significance between 8.82% and 10%.

 

Question 6

Ho: p £ 35%

Ha: p > 35%

Reject Ho if Z > 1.6449

p-hat = 84/200 = 0.42

Z = (0.42 – 0.35)/sqrt(0.35*0.65/200) = 2.0755

Reject Ho

Conclude that the percentage of Ipod users in the 18-34 age range has significantly increased.

 

Question 7

P-value = P(Z > 2.0755) = 1 – P(Z < 2.0755) = 1 – 0.981 = 0.019. Since this p-value is greater than 1%, we would have not have rejected Ho.

 

Question 8

Reject Ho if Z > 1.6449

Reject Ho if (phat – 0.35)/sqrt(0.35(0.65)/200) > 1.6449

Reject Ho if phat > 0.35 + 1.6449 sqrt(0.35(0.65)/200)

Reject Ho if phat > 0.4055

Power = P(reject Ho | Ha true)

Power = P(phat > 0.4055 | p = 0.42)

Power = P(Z > (0.4055 – 0.42)/sqrt(0.42(0.58)/200)) = P(Z > -0.4155) = 1 – P(Z < -0.4155) = 1 – 0.3389 = 0.6611

 

Question 9

Ho: p = 0.5

Ha: p ¹ 0.5

Reject Ho if Z < -1.96 or > 1.96

Z = (0.55 – 0.5)/sqrt(0.5(0.5)/400) = 2

Reject Ho.

Conclude the percentage of men watching HNIC is significantly different than 50%. Thus, the report is not true.

 

Question 10

P-value = 2P(Z > 2) = 2[1 – P(Z < 2)] = 2[1 – 0.9773]  = 0.0454. Since we rejected Ho, we would not reject Ho for levels of significance between 1% and 4.54%.

 

Question 11

Since this is a 2-tail test, we will compute Beta and then the power.

Accept Ho if –1.96 < Z < 1.96

Accept Ho if –1.96 < (phat – 0.5)/sqrt(0.5(0.5)/400) < 1.96

0.5 – 1.96 sqrt(0.5(0.5)/400) < phat < 0.5 + 1.96 sqrt(0.5(0.5)/400)

0.451 < phat < 0.549

B = P(accept Ho | Ha true)

B = P(0.451 < phat < 0.549 | p = 0.6)

B = P((0.451 – 0.6)/sqrt(0.6(0.4)/400) < Z < (0.549 – 0.6)/sqrt(0.6(0.4)/400))

B = P(-6.0829 < Z < -2.0821) = P(Z < -2.0821) = 0.0187

Power = 1 – 0.0187 = 0.9813

 

Question 12

Ho: m ³ 20

Ha: m < 20

Since the sample size is 8, the degrees of freedom is 7. Reject Ho if t < -1.8946.

t = (18.5 – 20)/6.3246/sqrt(8) = -0.6708

Do not reject Ho.

Conclude that people do not watch significantly less than 20 hours of TV a week.

 

Question 13

P-value = P(t < -0.6708) = 0.2619 based on 7 degrees of freedom. Since the p-value is greater than 10%, we do not reject Ho under the general rule of thumb.

 

Question 14

Ho: m = 0        

Ha: m ¹ 0

Reject Ho if t < -2.5706 or t > 2.5706 based on 5 degrees of freedom.

t = (0.005317 – 0)/(0.022951/sqrt(6)) = 0.5674.

Do not reject Ho. Conclude this clock system is not significantly different than GMT.

 

Question 15

Lower limit = 0.005317 – 2.5706(0.02295)/sqrt(6) = 0.005317 – 0.02409 = -0.02

Upper limit = 0.005317 + 0.02409 = 0.03

With 95% confidence, the average difference between the clock and GMT is between

–0.02 and + 0.03 seconds. We would reach the same conclusion at a 5% level of significance since the hypothesis mean of zero falls inside the 95% confidence interval.

 

Question 16

P-value = 2P(t > 0.5674)

P(t > 0.5674) = 1 – P(t < 0.5674) = 1 – 0.7025 = 0.2975. P-value = 2(0.2975) = 0.595. Since the p-value is greater than 10%, we do not reject Ho under the general rule of thumb.

 

Question 17

Ho: s £ 0.75

Ha:  s > 0.75

Reject Ho if c2 > 36.415

c2 = 24(0.9)2/(0.75)2 = 34.56

Do not reject Ho

Conclude that there is not significantly less consistency for this study.

 

Question 18

P-value = P(c2 > 34.56) = 1 - P(c2 < 34.56) = 0.0752. Since we did not reject Ho, we would reject Ho for levels of significance between 7.52% and 10%.

 

Question 19

Ho: s = 3.50

Ha: s ¹ 3.50

Reject Ho if c2 < 2.7004 or c2 > 19.0228

c2 = 9(7.1081)2/3.52 = 37.1207

Reject Ho

Conclude there is a significant change in the variability of oil prices.

 

Question 20

Lower limit for s2 = 9(7.1081)2/19.0228 = 23.9044

Upper limit for s2 = 9(7.1081)2/2.7004 = 168.3929

Lower limit for s = sqrt(23.9044) = 4.8892

Upper limit for s = sqrt(168.3929) = 12.9766

With 95% confidence, the standard deviation of oil prices is between $4.89 and $12.98.

We would reject Ho at a 5% level of significance since the hypothesis standard deviation of 3.50 falls outside the 95% confidence interval.